What Justice Means: February 1

   Micah 6:1-8 and Matthew 5:1-12                          Year A, Epiphany 4                                                              

                A few weeks ago we renewed our baptismal covenant, which is mostly the Apostle’s Creed with some questions at the end.  The final question is, Will you strive for justice and peace among all people, and respect the dignity of every human being?  The answer is, I will with God’s help.  I would say that most Christians agree that striving for justice is a good and noble thing.  Yet it would seem, we don’t all agree what justice means. 

          We often associate justice with courts or the consequences of unjust actions. In the Bible, justice is only used to talk about punishment and consequence 10% of the time.  The other 90% is caring for the vulnerable.  The Bible even defines who the vulnerable are.  Biblical scholars use the phrase, “quartet of the vulnerable” to refer to 4 groups that the Bible often references when talking about who the people of God need to care for.  These vulnerable groups are the poor, the orphans, the widows and the immigrants.  These were the groups of people who were most marginalized, most at risk when the Bible was written. (Remember that the Bible was written over hundreds and hundreds of years, so this wasn’t just a narrow snapshot in history.) Those groups are still vulnerable, some to lesser degrees than others.  I could give you numerous examples of places in the Bible where care of the vulnerable is mentioned, but that would take a long time.  It’s in the books of the law, it’s in the prophets, it’s in the psalms…it’s definitely in the words of Jesus. Justice is about caring for the vulnerable and the oppressed.

          That is why we can be fairly certain that when Micah writes, “do justice” that is what he’s talking about.  These 8 verses from chapter 6 of Micah are kind of quirky.  It’s hard to know who is talking.  It’s theoretically a conversation between God and the people of Israel, but it would seem that in the first few verses, God’s answers on behalf of the people of Israel.  One Hebrew scholar said this was a good example of God using sarcasm.  He starts by asking, “O, my people, what have I done to you? In what way have I wearied you?”  God doesn’t let them respond.  Instead he basically says, “Let me tell you all the things I have done for you…starting with saving you from slavery.” 

The people then get a chance to speak and ask, “With what shall I come before the Lord….” Then they proceed to give examples of things that they can sacrifice.  But all the sacrifices are rituals and some of them are absurd. Thousands of rams with tens of thousands of rivers of oil? Maybe they could have come up with thousands of rams….but rivers of oil? Clearly they are trying to overwhelm God with all that they have, their resources and wealth.

Then God responded with the words that would be quoted by activists, pastors and leaders for thousands of years. “O mortal, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness and to walk humbly with God.”  God doesn’t want your stuff, especially those rivers of oil that don’t actually exist.  God wants you to do justice, love kindness and walk with God.

 It sounds reasonable, doesn’t it?  We don’t hear the people’s response.  God goes on and frankly, it’s not looking good for the people for the rest of the Book of Micah.  God remains disappointed with them which leads me to believe that they didn’t respond well to his call to justice. I think they decided they would just continue to take advantage of the poor and oppressed and maybe keep up with the empty rituals.  I guess it was easier to find 1000 rams, slaughter them, and burn them than actually doing justice, loving kindness and walking with God.

 In some ways we haven’t changed much.  We still demand clear answers from God and then find creative ways to ignore them.  Over the centuries the church has been very creative when it comes to things we argue about.  I had one colleague whose church spent a year arguing about the carpet.  When Christ Church removed the stained glass windows for cleaning and then decided to keep the clear windows, people left the church. Every church has a story like that.

          It’s so much easier to argue about the details rather than actually doing justice, loving kindness and walking with God.  Doing justice is caring for the vulnerable. It’s ensuring that the people who are being treated horribly are treated well. It’s about relationship and empathy.  We know that’s a lot harder than ritual. 

What about loving kindness? We are all nice people.  We are in the city of brotherly love.  Right? Loving kindness is much deeper than simply being nice or polite.  The Hebrew word translated to loving kindness is hesed.  You see it all over the Old Testament.  One person described it as “reordering life into a community of enduring relations.” Not so easy.  Kindness (in this context at least) isn’t about simply being friendly. It is about our obligations to one another. If one suffers, we all suffer. It means we recognize that we are all in this together. 

We don’t have to look far to find the people who are suffering.  It is the poor, those who have no place to call home, people who are seeking a better life in this country but are being hunted like animals, the children who don’t have enough food, the elderly who don’t have anyone to work on their behalf, the lonely, those addicted to drugs and alcohol….I am sure you can fill in more.  There is no shortage of suffering.    That also means that there is no shortage of opportunities to do justice.

          What about walking humbly with God? Have we finally gotten to one that might be a little easier?  Most people assume that means walking with humility.  We could benefit from some more humility in this world.  Can you imagine how our conversation and policies could change if we all (and I mean ALL) admit that maybe we aren’t infallible, maybe we are capable of being wrong.  Think of the progress that could be made if when we were wrong, we just admitted we were wrong. But I think the emphasis is actually supposed to be on the walking…walking with God.  When the word walk is used in this context, it’s not just about the act of walking…it’s used to describe one’s orientation to life. So the question is, how is our life oriented to God?

          Just in case you are thinking, well that’s just the Old Testament. Jesus wasn’t actually that demanding.  Look at our Gospel reading. “Blessed are you when people revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account.”  The Beatitudes are all about reorienting our lives to God and caring for the vulnerable.  Anytime we try to make that kind reorientation, people get mad…because otherwise Jesus would not have had to warn people that they would be persecuted and reviled.  We see that happening today. People who are protesting in Minneapolis are being killed, arrested—persecuted and reviled.   We can and should lament that—especially the killing, because that is tragic and unjust.  This is what Jesus was warning us about in the Beatitudes.  When we prioritize the needs of the vulnerable, people will be persecuted and reviled. 

That terrifies me. I don’t like being reviled. I don’t want to be persecuted. I much prefer to go along with the flow.  Today scriptures are clear.  “Do justice, love kindness, walk humbly with your God.” Forget the rams and the rivers of oil.  That is not what God wants. God wants justice.  God wants kindness.  Most importantly, God has every intention of walking this walk with us.  Will you strive for justice and peace among all people, and respect the dignity of every human being?  The answer is, I will with God’s help. 

God Plays the Long Game: Nov. 1, 2020

Year A, All Saints                                               1 John 3:1-3, Matthew 5:1-12        

          If you read too much about All Saint’s Day, you will get confused.  It’s kind of a weird day. Most Episcopal churches celebrate it by reading the names of those who have died in the past year.  It’s an opportunity to mourn and remember. Yet the term “saint” is not what we think it is.  Frankly, I blame Billy Joel and his hit, “Only the Good Die Young.” One of the lines is: I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints.  He makes a distinction between the sinners and the saints, saints being those who are perfect and boring, while the sinners are… everyone else. 

Now, Billy Joel isn’t completely to blame.  I believe it was the early church that started it.  They wanted to honor those who had died for their faith, the martyrs.  They declared them saints after they died which led to the idea that saints were Christian superstars, the people who were super holy. They might have sinned a little, but definitely not much. 

However, if you read the New Testament (especially Paul’s letters), you will find the definition of saints is far different. When the Apostle Paul refers to saints, he refers to all Christians—not just the really good ones who have died, but all Christians, anyone who has been baptized.  I think it is good and appropriate to read the names of those who we have lost because they were and are saints of the church. They were not perfect, but they were God’s children, just as we are.  It is interesting that we find it easier to identify saints as those who have died, rather than those of us who are still living.  I think that is partially because we still have that idea in our heave of a saint being an extra holy Christian.  But it’s also natural to remember those who have died for their good qualities.  And you know, I have to admit, that when I looked at our list this year, there were several who I knew well and I perceived as especially good and committed Christians, people I would feel comfortable referring to as a saint.  But I doubt most of them would have considered themselves that way. 

Our three readings today effectively depict the various ways we define saints.  The reading from the Book of Revelation considers the future, after Jesus comes again and all are gathered together in paradise.  It’s a very traditional All Saints reading because it is otherworldly/heavenly---and while we know that a saint is any Christian, we still associate this day with those who have passed. 

The Gospel reading (the Beatitudes) is much more relevant to the living saints. It talks about those who are struggling today, right now.  Those who are poor in spirit, those who mourn, those who are meek….they are blessed right now.  It refers to what will be, but the blessing is now.   It even goes further to describe the Kingdom of Heaven as a place we can inhabit right here, right now. “Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness safe, for theirs IS the kingdom of heaven.”  Even the kingdom of heaven is now.  The reading from 1^st John combines the past, present and future.  “See what love the Father HAS given us….we ARE God’s children NOW….when he is revealed, we WILL be like him…”

I had a hard time deciding which text to preach on.  If I went with the Book of Revelation, then the focus would be on the saints who have died, the saints we remember today.  If I went with the Beatitudes, then it would be about the living saints.  I was leaning toward the Beatitudes when I happened to read something about Paul.  While Paul is not represented in our readings for today, his description of a saint is a big part of this day. It said a theme of Paul’s writings is, “Become what you are.”  I had never heard that before.  It kind of sounds like something that I would hear in a yoga class, but the more I thought about it, the more relevant it seemed, especially for today.

In fact, it is exactly what our reading from 1^st John is saying, “See what love the Father has given us, that we should be called children of God; and that is what we are.”  It’s refreshingly simple compared to what Paul usually writes.  We are called children of God and that is what we are.  Become what you are.  My friends, we can wait for our death for people to see us as saintly, or we can become what we already are.  We can claim the sainthood that was bestowed on us at our baptism.  Why are we so afraid of that?  Partly we are afraid because we lack confidence in our identity as children of God.  I mean we hear it a lot, but we don’t really take it in. But I think we’re also afraid to claim our sainthood because it means that we have to be more like Christ.  It’s much easier to admire Christ then emulate him. 

It’s ok if we are a little rusty on living like saints, because we will have ample opportunities to claim our sainthood in the near future.  This next week will be one of the most divisive in recent history.  It will divide families, neighborhoods and it even threatens to divide churches.  I know this election is important.  I really am aware of that. But it’s not the most important thing.  Our political leanings cannot define us. Why? Because we are children of God first.  We are citizens of the United States of America.  But before that, we are citizens of the Kingdom of God.   That is our most important citizenship and our most important loyalty. And guess what, God always wins. It doesn’t always seem like that because God plays the long game, but God always wins. Vote. Pray. Be passionate.  But remember who deserves your loyalty.  Remember to whom you belong. You are a saint, in God’s kingdom.  You belong to God.

Photo by Jude Beck on Unsplash