What Justice Means: February 1

   Micah 6:1-8 and Matthew 5:1-12                          Year A, Epiphany 4                                                              

                A few weeks ago we renewed our baptismal covenant, which is mostly the Apostle’s Creed with some questions at the end.  The final question is, Will you strive for justice and peace among all people, and respect the dignity of every human being?  The answer is, I will with God’s help.  I would say that most Christians agree that striving for justice is a good and noble thing.  Yet it would seem, we don’t all agree what justice means. 

          We often associate justice with courts or the consequences of unjust actions. In the Bible, justice is only used to talk about punishment and consequence 10% of the time.  The other 90% is caring for the vulnerable.  The Bible even defines who the vulnerable are.  Biblical scholars use the phrase, “quartet of the vulnerable” to refer to 4 groups that the Bible often references when talking about who the people of God need to care for.  These vulnerable groups are the poor, the orphans, the widows and the immigrants.  These were the groups of people who were most marginalized, most at risk when the Bible was written. (Remember that the Bible was written over hundreds and hundreds of years, so this wasn’t just a narrow snapshot in history.) Those groups are still vulnerable, some to lesser degrees than others.  I could give you numerous examples of places in the Bible where care of the vulnerable is mentioned, but that would take a long time.  It’s in the books of the law, it’s in the prophets, it’s in the psalms…it’s definitely in the words of Jesus. Justice is about caring for the vulnerable and the oppressed.

          That is why we can be fairly certain that when Micah writes, “do justice” that is what he’s talking about.  These 8 verses from chapter 6 of Micah are kind of quirky.  It’s hard to know who is talking.  It’s theoretically a conversation between God and the people of Israel, but it would seem that in the first few verses, God’s answers on behalf of the people of Israel.  One Hebrew scholar said this was a good example of God using sarcasm.  He starts by asking, “O, my people, what have I done to you? In what way have I wearied you?”  God doesn’t let them respond.  Instead he basically says, “Let me tell you all the things I have done for you…starting with saving you from slavery.” 

The people then get a chance to speak and ask, “With what shall I come before the Lord….” Then they proceed to give examples of things that they can sacrifice.  But all the sacrifices are rituals and some of them are absurd. Thousands of rams with tens of thousands of rivers of oil? Maybe they could have come up with thousands of rams….but rivers of oil? Clearly they are trying to overwhelm God with all that they have, their resources and wealth.

Then God responded with the words that would be quoted by activists, pastors and leaders for thousands of years. “O mortal, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness and to walk humbly with God.”  God doesn’t want your stuff, especially those rivers of oil that don’t actually exist.  God wants you to do justice, love kindness and walk with God.

 It sounds reasonable, doesn’t it?  We don’t hear the people’s response.  God goes on and frankly, it’s not looking good for the people for the rest of the Book of Micah.  God remains disappointed with them which leads me to believe that they didn’t respond well to his call to justice. I think they decided they would just continue to take advantage of the poor and oppressed and maybe keep up with the empty rituals.  I guess it was easier to find 1000 rams, slaughter them, and burn them than actually doing justice, loving kindness and walking with God.

 In some ways we haven’t changed much.  We still demand clear answers from God and then find creative ways to ignore them.  Over the centuries the church has been very creative when it comes to things we argue about.  I had one colleague whose church spent a year arguing about the carpet.  When Christ Church removed the stained glass windows for cleaning and then decided to keep the clear windows, people left the church. Every church has a story like that.

          It’s so much easier to argue about the details rather than actually doing justice, loving kindness and walking with God.  Doing justice is caring for the vulnerable. It’s ensuring that the people who are being treated horribly are treated well. It’s about relationship and empathy.  We know that’s a lot harder than ritual. 

What about loving kindness? We are all nice people.  We are in the city of brotherly love.  Right? Loving kindness is much deeper than simply being nice or polite.  The Hebrew word translated to loving kindness is hesed.  You see it all over the Old Testament.  One person described it as “reordering life into a community of enduring relations.” Not so easy.  Kindness (in this context at least) isn’t about simply being friendly. It is about our obligations to one another. If one suffers, we all suffer. It means we recognize that we are all in this together. 

We don’t have to look far to find the people who are suffering.  It is the poor, those who have no place to call home, people who are seeking a better life in this country but are being hunted like animals, the children who don’t have enough food, the elderly who don’t have anyone to work on their behalf, the lonely, those addicted to drugs and alcohol….I am sure you can fill in more.  There is no shortage of suffering.    That also means that there is no shortage of opportunities to do justice.

          What about walking humbly with God? Have we finally gotten to one that might be a little easier?  Most people assume that means walking with humility.  We could benefit from some more humility in this world.  Can you imagine how our conversation and policies could change if we all (and I mean ALL) admit that maybe we aren’t infallible, maybe we are capable of being wrong.  Think of the progress that could be made if when we were wrong, we just admitted we were wrong. But I think the emphasis is actually supposed to be on the walking…walking with God.  When the word walk is used in this context, it’s not just about the act of walking…it’s used to describe one’s orientation to life. So the question is, how is our life oriented to God?

          Just in case you are thinking, well that’s just the Old Testament. Jesus wasn’t actually that demanding.  Look at our Gospel reading. “Blessed are you when people revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account.”  The Beatitudes are all about reorienting our lives to God and caring for the vulnerable.  Anytime we try to make that kind reorientation, people get mad…because otherwise Jesus would not have had to warn people that they would be persecuted and reviled.  We see that happening today. People who are protesting in Minneapolis are being killed, arrested—persecuted and reviled.   We can and should lament that—especially the killing, because that is tragic and unjust.  This is what Jesus was warning us about in the Beatitudes.  When we prioritize the needs of the vulnerable, people will be persecuted and reviled. 

That terrifies me. I don’t like being reviled. I don’t want to be persecuted. I much prefer to go along with the flow.  Today scriptures are clear.  “Do justice, love kindness, walk humbly with your God.” Forget the rams and the rivers of oil.  That is not what God wants. God wants justice.  God wants kindness.  Most importantly, God has every intention of walking this walk with us.  Will you strive for justice and peace among all people, and respect the dignity of every human being?  The answer is, I will with God’s help.