Showing posts with label Gandhi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gandhi. Show all posts

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Cause a Scene: February 18, 2017

Year A, Epiphany 7                                                                 
Matthew 5:38-48                                                                   

            In seminary, one of the requirements was that we interned in a hospital as a chaplain.  We would visit people and mostly listen.  But then we met in a group which was essentially group therapy that was supposed to help us evaluate our behavior.  One the things that was ground into us was that we could never use the phrase, “You make me feel…”  We could say, “I feel sad because of something  that a patient said.”  But we could never say the other person made us feel something because then we were not taking ownership of our feelings.  Not only that, in doing so we were giving someone else power over our feelings. That is not the healthiest mindset and it does not help y ou help others.

In many ways, this concept of power was what Jesus was addressing in our Gospel today.  He was doing so in a very unique way.  If someone hits you, turn your cheek so they can hit the other one.  If someone steals you shirt, give them your coat too.  If someone takes advantage of you by making you carry their luggage for a mile, carry it another mile! This is not just unique, it’s plain crazy. Is this really how Christians are supposed to act---like doormats? It makes us appear weak, doesn’t it?  Who would ever want to associate with such weakness?

            As usual, there is more to this text than meets the eye.  First of all, remember who Jesus was talking to at this time.  These statements are part of the Sermon on the Mount---which we have been listening to for the last month.  Jesus was talking to a large group of followers, most of whom were poor.  They were also Jewish people living in Palestine, which means they were under Roman rule. They had very few rights.  Some of the examples that Jesus used in this reading were examples of people who had lost their rights and who were being taken advantage of. 

Let us consider the prevailing culture of the time.  Defending honor and avoiding shame (especially public displays of shame) were prevalent themes.  It is also a theme throughout the Old and New Testaments.   Battles were fought because one’s honor had been offended.  Family and friends were divided because of honor and shame.  Punishment was given to restore honor.  Often times the retaliation or punishment was greater in proportion to the crime itself.  The Old Testament sought to address this disproportion by limiting retaliation by essentially saying, “no more than an eye for an eye.”  For example, if someone punches you in face, it would not be appropriate to then kill them.  By the time Jesus was born, Jewish law had evolved by specifying a monetary fine for certain crimes.  Jesus of course, took it a few steps further.

            In Middle Eastern culture, to slap someone’s face was extremely offensive.  Just like today, people don’t usually slap people when they want to harm them.  They want to make a point.  You will notice from our reading that Jesus specifies the right side of the face.  Assuming that most people are right handed, to slap someone on the right side of the face, would mean you would have to backhand them.  This was pretty much the worst kind of insult you could inflict on someone.  It dishonored the person being slapped. The way to regain that honor was to return the slap.  Jesus was telling people to resist the urge to slap back.  By resisting the urge to retaliate, you were basically saying, “I cannot be dishonored that easily because you don’t have that kind of power over me.” 

            In the 2nd example, Jesus says that if anyone wants to sue you for your coat you give them your cloak as well.  This is commonly explained, “If someone takes your shirt, give them your coat as well.”  That is not an accurate translation.   At the time, this was actually a legal transaction.  If you were in debt (which a lot of poor people were---and still are for that matter), you would give your coat as pledge that you would repay the debt. At this time the coat was more of a tunic (and undergarment).  Poor people would almost surely have two of them. While losing one would be a loss, it would not be a life threatening.  What would be life threatening would be losing your cloak.  A poor person would only have one.  It was used not only to shield you from the cold during the day, but as a blanket at night. 

Why would Jesus tell these people to give up their cloak after they had already given up their tunic?  This meant that you were naked.  In using this example, Jesus was being more metaphorical than literal.  By giving up your clothing, you reveal yourself.  But not only do you reveal yourself, you reveal the shame of the person who is forcing  you to reveal yourself.  It becomes evident to all how extreme and unfair the punishment is.  It brings things out in the open.

            The third example is referring to the right of the Roman soldier to force a Jewish person to carry their load (whatever that might be) for a mile.  This was also a way to shame the community because it was further proof that someone had power over them.  However, there were limits to the power.  The Roman soldier was only allowed to force the Jew to go one mile.  If they went more, the soldier could get in trouble.  By going the extra mile, the person was once again displaying the unjustness of the society that they were living in.  While a mile was perceived as reasonable by the Romans, more than that was uncivilized.[1]  It got people’s attention.

            By making these requests, Jesus was not asking people to be weak.  He was asking for strength and refusal to be shamed no matter who had the perceived power in the situation.  This power differential continues in our society in many ways.  Some of these ways are less obvious than others.  How many of us, regardless of whether we feel poor or oppressed, have given someone else power over ourselves—meaning the power to affect our feelings and our self-worth?  It is pretty common. There are hundreds of self-help books devoted to the topic of self-empowerment.  We don’t need the self-help books, because Jesus addressed it here in the 1st century. 

The main difference between Jesus and the self-help books is that Jesus was not just talking about self-empowerment; he was talking about God-empowerment.  If your identity and your essence is rooted in God, then no person, no entity can shame you.  To be rooted in the identity of God means that you are inherently good and beautiful as you are made in God’s image.

Not only that, we have the power and the responsibility to stand up for those people who are being oppressed.  Jesus was not saying, “If someone is treating you unfairly, you might as well just give in and not cause a scene.”  He was saying, “Cause a scene--but not with violence, with honesty and your God given power---the power that no one can take away from you.”  Martin Luther King and Gandhi were both inspired by these words of Jesus. They were empowered by these words.  They changed the world with these words. 

In many ways Jesus died because he refused to appease the power structure of his day.  Then Christians did a crazy thing.  They took the cross, a symbol of Roman oppression and cruelty and they turned into a symbol of hope and redemption.  Let us remember that when we gaze at the beautiful crosses in our churches. They were not always so beautiful.  They were bloody and cruel.  Jesus transformed the cross and has also transformed us so that we can continue to be symbols and enablers of transformation in this world.  Later in the Gospel of Matthew Jesus told his disciples, “‘Have no fear of them; for nothing is covered up that will not be uncovered, and nothing secret that will not become known. What I say to you in the dark, tell in the light; and what you hear whispered, proclaim from the housetops.  Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul.’”[2]



[1] Explanations of the 3 examples were found in: Let the Scriptures Speak by Dennis Hamm   http://liturgy.slu.edu/7OrdA021917/theword_hamm.html
[2] Matthew 10:26-28a

Monday, November 7, 2016

Love everyone, even the person who voted for the other candidate: November 6, 2016

Year C, All Saints                                                                  
Luke 6:20-31                                                                          

            “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” This is the last sentence in our Gospel reading for today and probably one of the most familiar of the Bible.  It is sometimes referred to as the Golden Rule, possibly because it is the most important rule---or maybe because it is a rule that is consistent across most of the world religions.  Confucianism says, “Do not do to others what you do not want them to do to you.”  According to Buddhist teaching one must, “Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.”  Hinduism says, "Do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you." [1]  While these are all very similar to Jesus’ statement, one thing that differentiates them is that they are negative statements.  Don’t hurt other people in ways that you would not want to be hurt.  Jesus turns it around.  He makes it positive, “Do to others as you would have them do to you.”

            Jesus was not the only person to make the Golden Rule positive. He was a Jew and was heavily influenced by the Jewish scriptures.  When Jesus was asked about the greatest commandment, he answered “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind….and you shall love your neighbor as yourself.”[2] This is essentially another version of the Golden Rule and comes directly from Leviticus and Deuteronomy which are both books of the Hebrew Scriptures.  What Jesus was saying when he said, “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” (while wise and profound) was not exactly ground breaking.  It had been said before.

            But there was more to it than this one statement. This was essentially a sound bite to a much larger lesson. “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you.” Woh….that is taking the Golden Rule a few steps farther, maybe even too far for our comfort.  It is hard enough just to treat others the way we want to be treated.  Now Jesus is telling us that he wants us to treat people better than they are treating us??? That seems almost unreasonable.

            There are some people who have been able to follow Jesus’ example and treat others better than they were treated and not all of them have been Christians. Gandhi was a devout Hindu and is well known for his devotion to non-violence and passive resistance.  He lived out these words---loving his enemies and praying for those who abused him.  He respected and admired Jesus.  He followed many of the teachings of Jesus. When asked his views about Christianity he reportedly responded, “Oh it would be wonderful.”[3]  He was not critical of Christianity as much as he was of Christians ability to follow the teachings of Christ.  And who can blame him?  Loving people who hate us…that is some hard stuff.  Imagine a world where we could do that.  Imagine a world where we were willing to try to do that.  It would be wonderful.

            It is hard to imagine that right now, especially with this election coming up.  I know that every election divides people to some extent, but this one seems worse.       Perhaps it just seems that way because of social media.  It is a lot easier for people to air their grievances.  Don’t worry, I am not going to talk about the candidates and I am definitely not telling you who I am voting for.  I am sure we have people in this parish on both sides of the aisle. While we cannot all agree on who to vote for, I think we can all agree that the run up to this election has been crazy.  Many people have told me that they cannot look at their facebook feed…or anything on the internet for that matter because there is so much vitriol and hatred.  Even people who love one another, cannot talk about this election without getting angry. That was the rule at our recent family vacation.  No talking about politics! It was the only way to maintain the peace.  My concern is that it won’t be any better after the election.  One of these candidates has to win.  At the end of it all, most of us will all probably still stay in the country despite our threats to leave if our candidate doesn’t win.

            Whatever happens, we have to find a way not merely to live with one another, but to love one another…love the people who we cannot understand or agree with.  It is easy to see the divisiveness of this election and assume it is about the political candidates.  But the reality is that this polarization in our nation and our world has been growing for years.  Whatever we may be experiencing now is not the problem itself, it is merely a symptom of a greater problem.  I could try to articulate what that problem is, but I am not sure I know.  However, whatever the problem may be, the answer is not talking over one another until we grow so loud that we create a cacophony of hate and discord.  There has to be a better answer than that.

There are three different words for love in Biblical Greek, the language the Gospel of Luke was written in.  One word is for romantic love.  One is for love of family.  Then there is the word that refers to a love that is rooted in God’s love.  That is the word from today’s reading when Jesus tells us to love our enemies. Romantic love, family love, while those are certainly not easy loves, they are more natural, more convenient than godly love.  The kind of love that is required to love our enemy, or those who hurt us, or those who voted differently, or those whose opinions are vastly different than our own--- that is a love that requires our will and our effort.   Yet even our will and our effort is not enough to produce that kind of love.  That kind of love also requires the grace of God. That is what gives us the strength to love our enemies and those who hurt us.  

It is easy to say that we should love our enemy.  Why?  Because generally, we don’t know our enemy.  In theory, sure we can love that enemy who we will never meet.  I am tempted to say that the hardest people to love are the people who are closest to us.  But that is not even right.  I think that the hardest people to love are the people who we know just enough about…just enough that we can say with certainty that we don’t like them and we certainly don’t trust them.  They might be the person who is posting super obnoxious things on facebook. It might be the co-worker who always disagrees with you, even when you are clearly right. It might be the person who lives next door to you who complains even when you are being super quiet.  It is the person who is not worth the trouble of knowing, because let’s face it, you know you are not going to like them.

That is why we are divided.  We don’t have to know one another anymore.  We can stay in our own little silos and interact with people who we know will agree with us, or at least have the good manners not to admit when they disagree.  While that is a convenient way to live, it’s not what God intended. That is why the church, the body of Christ is so very important.  It is one of the few places where we do not have to have anything in common with one another, except the love of God. That is all we have to know about one another… at least to start. If that is where we start, then imagine how far we can go.  We can go past the church.  We can look at every person and say, I know what I have in common with them. God loves them and God wants me to love them too.  In the end…that is all that matters.  God loves us. God loves them. We should love them too. And you know what…if just the Christians in this world could display that kind of love, that would be a wonderful thing.  The world would be transformed.  Let’s stop imagining and starting being that vision of the world.  



[1] These are just pieces of these major religions.  They do not represent everything this religion said regarding how to treat others. 
[2] Matthew 22:36-40
[3] https://www.workingpreacher.org/preaching.aspx?commentary_id=816  (I have not been able to find the source of this quote.  However, it aligns with other things that Gandhi said about Christianity.)