Sunday, March 31, 2024

We Know a Man Named Jesus: March 31, 2024

 Easter, Year B                                                                          Mark 16:1-8 and Acts 10:34-43                                                                      

            This reading from Mark feels incomplete.  Mark has some of the pieces that we expect in an Easter Gospel reading. There is the empty tomb and a man in white who greets the women and tells them that Jesus has risen.  However, there is no appearance of the risen Christ, no sharing of the Gospel message.  The last line is: “So they went out and fled from the tomb, for terror and amazement had seized them; and they said nothing to anyone; for they were afraid.”  This ending made early scholars so uncomfortable, two optional endings were added on centuries later—a shorter ending and a longer ending. 

The shorter ending is one verse long and includes the women going and telling the disciples, just as they were told to do.  The longer ending is 11 verses and includes appearances of the risen Christ and instructions from Jesus to the disciples about spreading the good news.  No one knows who wrote these additional endings.  We just know that it wasn’t the original author of the Gospel of Mark.  One might ask why these additions were made and accepted as gospel for so long? I believe it’s because we like neat and tidy endings.  We like happy endings, especially on Easter. 

            Some think that Mark’s original ending was lost.  The text would have been written on papyrus…which was a delicate material.  It’s not irrational to conclude that something could have  broken off.  However, if we look at the rest of Gospel of Mark, we can see that he had a style which was a bit like a news reporter with limited space. Just the facts.  For instance, Mark didn’t include the story of Jesus birth.  For him, that was not critical to the story.  Mark’s emphasis was on the cross and the sacrifice of Jesus.  There is also a unique theme in Mark called the Messianic Secret in that whenever someone revealed Jesus to be who he truly was, Jesus told them to be quiet and ordered them not to tell anyone.  The theory is that Jesus didn’t believe anyone could truly understand who he was without him dying on the cross. 

            In some ways, it’s a cruel irony that the last line would be that the women said nothing. The whole Gospel Jesus has been telling people not to tell anyone who he was and now they have this magnificent news and they are still following his original directions.  But at the transfiguration (when Jesus appeared with Moses and Elijah--- 2 great prophets who had died long before) he told the disciples not to tell anyone until after he had risen from the dead.  They didn’t know what that meant at the time, but Jesus hoped that they would once it actually happened. Now was the time.  Now was the time to finally tell, but if all we know is what we read here in chapter 16 of Mark, they never told---for terror and amazement had seized them.

            And yet…they must have told.  We know this because the other gospels tell the 2nd part of the story.  It’s even in our reading from Acts today.  But the primary way we know that the women shared this amazing story is because we are still talking about it.  That is why you all are here today.  It’s not just the flowers and the glorious music.  It’s not just the finger sandwiches or the baptisms.  We are here because we believe that something incredible and frightening happened 2000 years ago, something that should never have happened. People die every day. It’s horrible and it painful, but it’s real and we all believe in death.  Jesus’s disciples knew he had died. They were ready to grieve his death and visit his grave. They were not ready for this brand new reality, the reality that this carpenter from Nazareth had defeated death. 

            So back to Mark.  Why did he leave it without the ending we all want?  I think Mark knew, that it’s wasn’t up to him to finish the story.  It’s up to us to share the good news.  Do we share the good news because it’s interesting and fun? I guess that could be a reason.  Someone coming back from the dead is definitely newsworthy.  But I think if we look at our reading from Acts, we will hear why this news of Jesus’ resurrection is good news.  We call the gospel the good news, but we never talk about why it’s good news.

            Peter (the guy who denied Jesus and was constantly sticking his foot in his mouth) went on to be a rock star disciple after the resurrection.  In this reading from Acts, we hear part of Peter’s message: “I truly understand that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him…he is Lord of all.”  Do you know what kind of message that was? It’s one of our favorite words here at Christ Church.  It was revolutionary.    This wasn’t revolutionary for a specific place or a specific people—it was for ALL people EVERYWHERE. 

This was a time when only certain people were allowed in the temple.  And it wasn’t just the Jewish faith that had limitations, almost every faith had limitations on who was and wasn’t loved by God.  There was no major religion that was open to all regardless of gender, sexuality, color or race.  Yet that was what Jesus and Peter were trying to do, show a new way where all people could approach God as equals.   

That was Jesus’s intention, but it took Christians a long time to figure that out, even though this idea of God’s love for all is what Peter was encouraging 2000 years ago. It was that radical, that it took 2000 years for us really to embrace the fact that God shows no partiality. God has no favorites.  And I admit we are not completely there yet.  We still have work to do. Yet I am confident that the more we can celebrate and embrace the resurrection and the more we can follow the path that Jesus created for us, the more we can be a truly a revolutionary community of believers.  Because before we can consider ourselves revolutionary, we must first consider ourselves people of the resurrection.

            There is a reason this fisherman with little education was able share that kind of radical message that took 2000 years for us to embrace.  Because he knew a man named Jesus who had treated all people with love and compassion.  He knew a man named Jesus who died on a cross because people were not ready for his message.  He knew a man named Jesus who promised he would be resurrected and then defeated death.  That is how he could say “God shows no partiality…” 

Do you know a man named Jesus? It’s ok if you don’t completely know him.  Look what it took for Peter to get on board—a lot.  We always say at Christ Church, “Whoever you are and wherever you find yourself on your journey of faith, you are welcome at Christ Church.”  That’s true.  You don’t have to believe a certain thing to be a part of this community.  But let me tell you why I and so many others can provide that message of unconditional love and welcome….because we know a man named Jesus who loves all nations, blesses all nations and shows no partiality.  We want you to know him too. 

No comments:

Post a Comment